Analytical Report: AI Integration in RPGs – Community Perception vs. Actual
Sentiment
Conducted by:
Stuart Shaw – Linguistic Data Analyst, Senior Customer Insights Advisor (Suncorp), Author of “Dice &
Data: Your Ultimate Toolkit for ChatGPT Creativity and Game Mastery”
Date: December 12, 2023
Executive Summary
This analytical report delves into the sentiments of the
tabletop role-playing game (TTRPG) community regarding the integration of
Artificial Intelligence (AI). Employing both quantitative and qualitative
research methodologies, the study rigorously evaluates community attitudes by analysing
365 survey responses and reviewing 295 comments from TTRPG-focused online
platforms. The goal is to discern the prevailing perceptions of AI within the
community and to contrast these findings with the tone and content of online
forum discussions.
Introduction
The advent of AI technologies has sparked a spectrum of
responses within the TTRPG community, from enthusiastic endorsement to cautious
scepticism. This report seeks to methodically dissect and interpret these
varied perspectives. By synthesizing data from a general Dungeons and Dragons
Facebook group poll and targeted commentary analysis, we provide a multifaceted
view of the community's stance towards AI's role in TTRPGs. Our approach is
designed to yield a nuanced understanding of the community's collective
sentiment, highlighting areas of consensus as well as contention.
Methodology
- Survey Analysis: A survey with 365 responses were analyzed to gauge the RPG community's sentiment towards the use of AI in tabletop roleplaying
games. This poll was posted in a general Dungeons and Dragons Facebook group.
Due to the open manner of this survey and the relatively anonymous response
mechanism to the poll, the results are considered an approximation of the
general sentiment that the TTRPG community has towards AI.1
- Commentary Analysis: A qualitative examination of 295 comments from Facebook groups focused on TTRPGs. These comments, which include
responses to a survey poll post, specifically address the topic of AI usage in
TTRPGs. It's imperative to note that no personal information was copied,
stored, or submitted to any AI for this analysis, maintaining strict adherence
to privacy and ethical standards.2
Limitations and Margins of Error
Research Limitations
This study, while rigorous in its approach, is subject to
certain limitations that must be acknowledged:
- Sample Representation: The survey and
commentary analyses were conducted within specific online communities, which
may not comprehensively represent the global RPG community. Consequently, the
sentiments expressed may reflect the predispositions of these particular
forums.
- Self-Selection Bias: Participation in
both the survey and online discussions is voluntary, potentially leading to
self-selection bias. This means those with stronger opinions may have been more
inclined to respond, which could skew the data towards more extreme viewpoints.
- Survey Scope: The survey's reach, while
substantial, was limited to a single Facebook group. The responses, therefore,
may be indicative of the sentiment within that group rather than the broader
community.
- Temporal Context: Sentiments towards AI
can be highly dynamic, influenced by technological advancements and public
discourse. The data reflects community sentiment at a specific time and may
evolve rapidly with the changing landscape of AI in gaming.
Margins of Error
The findings of this research are indicative and carry
inherent margins of error:
- Approximation of Sentiment: The survey
results provide an approximation of community sentiment, which may not capture
the full nuance of individual perspectives.
- Analytical Subjectivity: Qualitative
analysis of comments involves a degree of interpretation, which, despite
efforts to maintain objectivity, introduces a margin of subjectivity into the
findings.
- Data Incompleteness: The possibility of
incomplete data capture from online discussions exists, given the reliance on
publicly available comments, which may not include deleted or private
discussions.
Indicative Findings and Further Research
Given these limitations and margins of error, the results of
this study should be considered indicative rather than definitive. The patterns
and trends identified offer valuable insights but also underscore the need for
a more comprehensive and methodical approach. A broader, more inclusive
research design, perhaps encompassing a wider array of platforms and a
longitudinal study framework, could yield findings with greater
generalizability and reduced margins of error. Such an approach would be
instrumental in validating the preliminary insights derived from this study and
in forming a more nuanced understanding of the role of AI in the TTRPG community.
Data Analysis
The findings suggest a community leaning towards acceptance of AI, with a significant portion actively endorsing it:
- Strongly Opposed: 25% express a robust opposition to AI in TTRPGs, potentially due to concerns over creative integrity, data privacy, or the authenticity of the gaming experience.
- Opposed: A minimal 4% stand opposed, showing some reservations about AI without strong sentiment.
- Neutral: 18% of the community sits in the neutral zone, possibly indicating ambivalence, or a wait-and-see attitude towards the impact of AI on TTRPGs.
- Supportive: A notable 41% express general support, suggesting that a substantial majority recognize the potential advantages of AI without the intensity of the 'strongly supportive' group.
- Strongly Supportive: 12% of respondents are enthusiastic proponents of AI, indicating a segment that may perceive AI as a beneficial tool for enhancing the TTRPG experience.
The qualitative commentary
analysis reveals a more pronounced expression of sentiment, with a tilt towards
opposition:
- Strongly Opposed:
Mirroring the survey, a substantial 21% of commenters are firmly against AI,
reinforcing the notion that those with strong objections are more inclined to
express their views.
- Opposed: The opposed
sentiment increases to 26% within the commentary, suggesting that those with
negative views on AI are more likely to share their opinions publicly.
- Neutral: 20% of comments
reflect a neutral stance, a slight increase from the survey, which could
signify an engagement bias where neutrals are more likely to engage in
discussion than to participate in surveys.
- Supportive: 30% of
comments show support, aligning somewhat with the survey but with a lower
percentage, indicating the possibility of a silent supportive majority.
- Strongly Supportive: Only
3% of commenters actively advocate for AI, a stark contrast to the survey
results, suggesting that those in strong support may be less vocal in open
forums.
Comparative Analysis
The juxtaposition of survey data with online commentary
portrays a nuanced landscape of AI sentiment within the TTRPG community. While
the survey indicates a leaning towards support, the online discourse suggests a
more vocally expressed opposition. This discrepancy may result from the varying
nature of engagement in anonymous surveys versus public forums, where individuals
with strong opinions may be more motivated to voice their concerns or
endorsements.
The data indicates that while a vocal minority may skew
public perception, the broader community's sentiment is more balanced, with a
tendency towards acceptance of AI in TTRPGs. This insight is crucial for
stakeholders in the TTRPG industry, including game designers, AI developers,
and community leaders, to understand the complex dynamics at play and to
address the concerns and expectations of their audience effectively.
Ethical Considerations
In conducting this analysis, we upheld the highest standards
of privacy and data protection. No individual's personal data was collected,
processed, or stored at any stage of this study. Our methodology conformed to
the stringent ethical guidelines and privacy standards established for
scholarly research, ensuring that all data utilized was devoid of personally
identifiable information.
Conclusions
Our comprehensive analysis has surfaced a notable divergence
between the TTRPG community's general sentiment towards AI in TTRPGs and the
prevailing tone within online discussions. The survey data portrays a
relatively balanced array of viewpoints, whereas online discourse appears to be
disproportionately influenced by a vocally oppositional minority. This dynamic
may be skewing the perceived consensus on AI within TTRPGs and potentially
shaping an inaccurate public narrative.
Recommendations
- Fostering Balanced Participation: We recommend a
proactive approach to cultivating a more representative online discourse by
encouraging a wider spectrum of the community—particularly those with
supportive or neutral views—to engage in conversations about AI in RPGs.
- Implementing Educational Initiatives: There is a
clear need for the dissemination of factual and comprehensive information
regarding the role and impact of AI in TTRPGs. This would serve to demystify AI
technology, address prevalent misconceptions, and elucidate the actual benefits
and challenges it presents.
- Promoting Constructive Engagement: We advocate for
the creation and nurturing of platforms that facilitate respectful and informed
dialogue among community members with diverse opinions. Such platforms should
aim to bridge understanding and foster a space where constructive conversations
can lead to consensus-building.
Future Research and Additions
- Expanded Data Collection: To further substantiate our
findings, we express a readiness to extend the scope of data collection. A more
expansive dataset could enable a deeper and more granular analysis, potentially
yielding even more insightful conclusions.
- Preparation for Peer Review: We acknowledge the value
of peer review in academic and professional spheres and express our willingness
to augment this report with additional detail and to subject our methods and
findings to the scrutiny of external experts.
Appendixes
Back to RPG AI Blog
Written by Stuart Shaw, a 40-year veteran of tabletop role-playing games. His journey started with Dungeons & Dragons in 1983, and he is the author of "Dice and Data: Your Ultimate Toolkit for ChatGPT Creativity and Game Mastery". Stuart is eager to share his passion and expertise with the world and enjoys writing about news and innovations in the RPG world. Join him on an exciting adventure into the world of TTRPGs. About me.